The latest face off between media personality, Chinedu Emmanuel, popularly known as Nedu Wazobia or simply Nedu and activist VeryDarkMan has taken a new twist.
In fact, sooner than later, it is the court of law that will have to decide the fate of this controversial case.
Yes, the issue is already before the court.
You see, on Tuesday, February 24, 2025, a notice was served to Martins Vincent Otse, widely known as VeryDarkMan.
Indeed, it was a comprehensive letter, one full with details and allegations.
The letter was addressed to VDM by lawyers who say they act as legal representatives of Nedu and Tokindrumz Picture and Media Ltd.
However, the big question begging for an answer remains, what really caused this fight?
As usual, we are here with the full gist.
While this fight started some days ago on the Honest Bunch podcast, Nedu seems to be more interested in what he claims to be defamation by VDM.
The Defamation Video
On Wednesday, February 19, VDM shared a video via his YouTube and Instagram channel.
He tagged the video ‘How Nedu diverted NGO scholarship meant for Nigerians’.
In that video, VeryDarkMan accused Nedu of fraud and diversion of funds.
Well, Nedu’s lawyer says the 12-minute video contains nothing but lies.
They noted that the video contained “a host of defamatory, false and disparaging attacks and rhetorics” against their clients, Nedu and Tokindrumz.
They added that VDM spelt ‘fraud’ as ‘fr@vd’ in an attempt to “circumvent the law”.
The lawyers also wrote in the letter that the case of the Metropolitan School of Business and Management UK (MSBM) had already been investigated by the relevant authorities who did not find enough proof to adjudicate the matter.
The Demand
They added that VDM has posted several videos since then, all repeating and continuing the same “false and defamatory attacks on their clients”.
Also Read: 6 Damaging Things Yvonne Jegede Said About Nedu
They quoted VDM saying that Nedu also used Timaya and Kcee Limpopo to “institute the fraud”.
Attaching documents as proof, they demanded the following options: a retraction of every video involving Nedu on every one of VDM’s platforms within 24 hours of receiving the notice; a public apology published on all of his platforms; and the sum of ₦500m for the damage caused to Nedu’s reputation.
The lawyers noted that Failure to comply with these directives will leave them no choice but to file an action against VDM.
