Abure vs Apapa: Labour Party Gives Clear Explanation Of Appeal Court Ruling

The crisis rocking the Labour Party (LP) is becoming more intense and the party has decided to act quickly by giving detailed explanation of the Appeal Court ruling.

The party denied reports that an Appeal Court sacked the party’s leadership led by Barrister Julius Abure.

Abure vs Apapa: Labour Party Gives Clear Explanation Of Appeal Court Ruling
Lamidi Apapa & Julius Abure

The state chapter accused the Lamidi Apapa-led group of misinforming the general public by its interpretation of the ruling of the Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja, asking the parties involved in a leadership tussle to maintain the status quo.

The Ruling

The Labour Party earlier asked the Court of Appeal to quash the trial court’s comment in the Federal High Court, Owerri, insisting that Senator Athan Achonu won the Imo State governorship election primaries.

In its Thursday ruling, the Court of Appeal Owerri, sitting in Abuja held that the appeal by the Labour Party was not necessary.

This is because the decision of the trial court was in its favour and that mere comment of the trial judge in the matter was not a judgment and should be discountenanced.

Apapa’s Claim

However, Apapa spoke with journalists, after the judgement.

He claimed that the court ruling reaffirmed that Abure was not the authentic party chairman when the primaries were conducted.

“The Edo State matter more or less has to do with civil matters.

The Excos in Edo suspended him, and they went to court because of that, and they don’t have the right to suspend him. I’m talking about the ward level.

“But the FCT (court) restraining order has to do with criminal matters and is between the state and Abure, and nobody is above the law.

Did You Miss? These Three States Will Experience Power Outage For Six Days

That’s the difference between a civil matter and a criminal matter.

The Order

“The order of FCT has not been vacated, and that is why, on the basis of that, the Appeal Court reaffirmed that by the time he conducted his primary, the restraining order was in place.

“And up till today, the order is still in force. That’s the difference between the two.”

Clarifying the misinformation in a statement signed by the National Publicity Secretary of the party, Obiora Ifoh, the party described the ruling of the Appeal Court as a devastating blow for the group as well as Basil Maduka, who is contending the governorship candidacy for Imo state.

Twisting The Judgment

He accused Lamidi Apapa of misinforming the public by twisting the clear judgment of the appellate court.

“It is, therefore, important to state that neither the Federal High Court Owerri nor the Court of Appeal Owerri, which sat in Abuja today made any orders in the matter other than for lack of locus standi against the plaintiff (Basil Maduka).

“Consequently, the status quo remains with Senator Athan Achonu as the validly nominated candidate of Labour Party for 2023 Imo governorship election.

The Dust Has Settled

“With this Court of Appeal judgment and the endorsement of Senator Achonu by our national leader Peter Obi, Abia State Governor Alex Otti, the Labour Party National Chairman Julius Abure, and other stakeholders and party members, the dust has settled on the gubernatorial ticket issue.

“Achonu has received the governorship flag of the party and has since flagged off his campaign with a well-attended ceremony in Owerri on Tuesday.

You May Like: How President Tinubu, Kwankwaso’s Ministerial Plan Crumbled

“We are, therefore, calling on the Labour Party members, Obidient faithful, and the general public to distance themselves from these falling and compromised members of the party who have since been shoved out of the party.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Next Post

Ex-Gov Of Cross River, Donald Duke Loses Mum

Sun Aug 27 , 2023
The […]
Donald Duke

You May Like